Skip to content
fonteum
ResearchToolsFonteumPricingCoverageMethodologyTrustAbout
DATA · MAY 8, 2026
Fonteum/Research/MIPS Score Distribution by Participation Type (PY2023)

Contents

  1. Overview
  2. Data source
  3. Limitations
  4. Limitations
  5. Methodology
  6. Cite this study
Download dataset (CSV)

477,137 records

MIPS Score Distribution by Participation Type (PY2023)

Score band analysis of 477,137 clinicians in the CMS Quality Payment Program — performance year 2023. National mean, median, high-performer share, and payment penalty exposure.

By Fonteum Research·Published May 25, 2026·477,137 records·1 charts·Cite this study →
Contents · 6 sections↓
  1. Overview
  2. Data source
  3. Limitations
  4. Limitations
  5. Methodology
  6. Cite this study

Executive Summary

  • 477,137 clinicians have a final MIPS score in CMS QPP Performance Year 2023 — the most comprehensive public view of physician quality measurement in the U.S.
  • The national mean final score is 83.06 and the median is 85.49, indicating most clinicians cluster above the high-performer threshold of 75.
  • 85.5% of clinicians scored at or above 75 — CMS's high-performer threshold — earning a positive payment adjustment.
  • 2.4% of clinicians (11,289) scored below 18.75, the 2023 payment penalty threshold, and face a downward Medicare payment adjustment.
  • MIPS score distribution is heavily left-skewed: the penalty and low-performer bands together represent only 3.9% of participating clinicians.
Download the full dataset (CSV, 477,137 records)

At a glance — for journalists, researchers, and AI agents

What this dataset covers

  • ✓Score band analysis of 477,137 clinicians in the CMS Quality Payment Program — performance year 2023. National mean, median, high-performer share, and payment penalty exposure.
  • ✓Dataset: 477,137 records analyzed.

What this dataset does NOT cover

  • ✕Fonteum analysis is not a quality measurement of any individual provider.
  • ✕Counts and rankings describe the Fonteum-indexed or source-published dataset, not the entire U.S. market.

Sources

  • Fonteum indexed dataset

Snapshot date: 2026

Dataset scope · Snapshot May 25, 2026

Includes: the healthcare-provider records this study covers, each tracing to a dated public-record source named in the citation footer. Does not include: providers outside the source named for this study, or records not present in that source at the snapshot date. Counts describe this Fonteum healthcare-provider dataset — not a representative census of the U.S. healthcare workforce.

Key findings

477,137
Clinicians with MIPS scores
Performance Year 2023 final scores from CMS QPP, as ingested by Fonteum (cms_qpp_mips_individual).
83.06
National mean MIPS score
Average final composite score across all 477,137 clinicians with a final_score in PY2023.
85.49
National median MIPS score
The median is higher than the mean, indicating a left-skewed distribution — most clinicians score well above the high-performer threshold.
85.5%
High performers (score ≥ 75)
407,728 clinicians scored at or above CMS's high-performance threshold of 75 points in PY2023.
2.4%
Penalty track (score < 18.75)
11,289 clinicians scored below the 2023 payment penalty threshold, facing a downward Medicare payment adjustment.

Overview

The MIPS Score Distribution study analyzes final composite scores for 477,137 clinicians participating in the CMS Quality Payment Program (QPP) under the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) for Performance Year 2023.

Why it matters: MIPS scores directly affect Medicare payment adjustments — clinicians below the penalty threshold face reduced reimbursements, while high performers can earn bonuses. The distribution of scores reveals how the program's incentive structure plays out across U.S. physicians and practitioners.

Score bands:

  • High performer (≥ 75): 407,728 clinicians (85.5%) — eligible for a positive payment adjustment
  • Average performer (45–74.99): 50,962 clinicians (10.7%)
  • Low performer (18.75–44.99): 7,158 clinicians (1.5%)
  • Penalty track (< 18.75): 11,289 clinicians (2.4%) — subject to a negative payment adjustment

What this data is not: MIPS scores measure administrative participation and reported quality metrics within the QPP program structure. A high MIPS score reflects documentation and reporting completeness, not necessarily clinical outcomes. See Limitations.

Data source

CMS Quality Payment Program (QPP) Individual Clinician Performance Data — Performance Year 2023. Public domain under 17 U.S.C. § 105. Downloaded from qpp.cms.gov.

Key fields used: npi (10-digit National Provider Identifier), final_score (composite MIPS score 0–100), quality_score, cost_score, ia_score (Improvement Activities), pi_score (Promoting Interoperability), payment_adjustment_pct.

Methodology version: cms-qpp-mips/v1 (pinned constant; never runtime-derived).

Limitations

Participation type not available in current data. The participation_type column (individual / group / facility-based) is not populated in the PY2023 QPP dataset as ingested. A full specialty cross-tab requires joining cms_qpp_mips_individual with NPPES taxonomy codes by NPI — flagged as §sprint3-mips-nppes-join for a future wave. Until that join is available, this study analyzes score distribution across all participating clinicians, not by specialty.

MIPS ≠ quality of care. MIPS scores reflect compliance with QPP reporting requirements and selected quality measures. A low MIPS score may indicate non-participation, exemptions (small practice, extreme hardship), or administrative gaps — not necessarily poor care.

PY2023 fixed snapshot. Data reflects CMS QPP release for Performance Year 2023. Scores do not update intra-year.

PHI note: Only aggregated statistics are presented. No individual NPI, clinician name, or practice location is included in this study's output.

Limitations

  • This study's findings are scoped to the dataset and time window described in the methodology. They do not constitute medical, legal, or financial advice.
  • Fonteum does not independently rate, inspect, verify, endorse, or guarantee any provider referenced in this study.

Methodology

Read the full methodology↓

Final composite MIPS scores sourced from CMS QPP Individual Performance Data, Performance Year 2023. Score bands follow CMS payment adjustment thresholds: penalty track < 18.75; low performer 18.75–44.99; average performer 45–74.99; high performer ≥ 75. National mean and median computed over all 477,137 records with a non-null final_score. Methodology version: cms-qpp-mips/v1.

Final composite MIPS scores sourced from CMS QPP Individual Performance Data, Performance Year 2023. Score bands follow CMS payment adjustment thresholds: penalty track < 18.75; low performer 18.75–44.99; average performer 45–74.99; high performer ≥ 75. National mean and median computed over all 477,137 records with a non-null final_score. Methodology version: cms-qpp-mips/v1.

Cite this study

Fonteum. (2026). MIPS Score Distribution by Participation Type (PY2023). Fonteum (methodology v2026.05.0). https://fonteum.com/research/mips-score-distribution-by-specialty-2023
https://fonteum.com/research/mips-score-distribution-by-specialty-2023
@misc{fonteum2026mipsscoredistributionbyspecialty2023, author = {Fonteum}, title = {MIPS Score Distribution by Participation Type (PY2023)}, year = {2026}, url = {https://fonteum.com/research/mips-score-distribution-by-specialty-2023}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-25} }

Attribution: Fonteum analysis · methodology v2026.05.0

Snapshot date: 2026

Dataset: Download CSV (477,137 records)

Press / data requests: press@fonteum.com

fonteum

Healthcare provider data, traced to source.


RESEARCH

  • Research hub
  • Data platform
  • For health-tech
  • Pricing
  • Press kit

NETWORK

  • Coverage
  • Healthcare graph

ABOUT

  • Mission
  • Methodology
  • Editorial policy
  • Corrections log
  • Security
  • SLA
  • Support
  • Refresh cadence
  • Terms
  • Contact

SUBSCRIBE

The monthly research digest. One email, first of each month. Unsubscribe anytime.


© 2026 FONTEUM RESEARCH · DATA SNAPSHOT MAY 8, 2026 · BUILT WITH CARE

  • X
  • LINKEDIN
  • PRESS