Skip to content
fonteum
ResearchToolsFonteumPricingCoverageMethodologyTrustAbout
DATA · MAY 8, 2026
Fonteum/Research/Nursing Home Health Deficiencies & Harm Rate by State (2026)

Contents

  1. What this report is, and is not
  2. Severity breakdown
  3. Top F-tags cited
  4. State harm rates (G+ citations per facility)
  5. Limitations
  6. Methodology
  7. Citation and reuse
  8. Limitations
  9. Methodology
  10. Cite this study

Nursing Home Health Deficiencies & Harm Rate by State (2026)

418,148 CMS health deficiency citations across 14,635 nursing homes — severity breakdown, top F-tags, and state-level harm rate (G+ citations per facility). Illinois leads at 4.57 harm-rate citations per facility; New Hampshire is lowest at 0.31 — a 14.7x disparity. CMS data with cryptographic provenance.

By Fonteum Research·Published May 25, 2026·14,635 records·1 charts·Cite this study →
Contents · 10 sections↓
  1. What this report is, and is not
  2. Severity breakdown
  3. Top F-tags cited
  4. State harm rates (G+ citations per facility)
  5. Limitations
  6. Methodology
  7. Citation and reuse
  8. Limitations
  9. Methodology
  10. Cite this study

Executive Summary

  • 418,148 CMS health deficiency citations across 14,635 nursing homes form the basis of this analysis — drawn from the CMS Care Compare NH Health Deficiencies dataset (source modified 2026-04-17).
  • 5.59% of all citations (23,368) are Severity G or higher — meaning CMS surveyors found actual harm to a resident. 2.36% are Severity J/K/L (immediate jeopardy — an immediate threat to resident life or safety).
  • Illinois leads all states with 4.57 Severity G+ citations per facility cited (666 facilities). New Hampshire is the lowest at 0.31 per facility (74 facilities) — a 14.7x disparity between the highest- and lowest-harm-rate states.
  • The three most-cited F-tags are F0880 (Infection Prevention & Control, 23,555 citations), F0689 (Free of Accident Hazards, 21,352), and F0812 (Food Safety, 19,927) — together representing 15.3% of all citations.
  • CMS citations are published enforcement records, not Fonteum ratings. Fonteum does not independently inspect, rate, or guarantee any facility. State harm rates are descriptive, not endorsements of any facility or system.

At a glance — for journalists, researchers, and AI agents

What this dataset covers

  • ✓418,148 CMS health deficiency citations across 14,635 nursing homes — severity breakdown, top F-tags, and state-level harm rate (G+ citations per facility). Illinois leads at 4.57 harm-rate citations per facility; New Hampshire is lowest at 0.31 — a 14.7x disparity. CMS data with cryptographic provenance.
  • ✓Dataset: 14,635 records analyzed.

What this dataset does NOT cover

  • ✕Fonteum analysis is not a quality measurement of any individual provider.
  • ✕Counts and rankings describe the Fonteum-indexed or source-published dataset, not the entire U.S. market.

Sources

  • Fonteum indexed dataset

Snapshot date: 2026

Dataset scope · Snapshot May 25, 2026

Includes: the healthcare-provider records this study covers, each tracing to a dated public-record source named in the citation footer. Does not include: providers outside the source named for this study, or records not present in that source at the snapshot date. Counts describe this Fonteum healthcare-provider dataset — not a representative census of the U.S. healthcare workforce.

Key findings

418,148
Total CMS deficiency citations
Across 14,635 nursing homes in the CMS Care Compare NH Health Deficiencies dataset (source modified 2026-04-17).
5.59%
Citations at Severity G+ (actual harm)
23,368 citations where CMS surveyors found actual harm to a resident (Severity G, H, or I on the CMS scale).
2.36%
Citations at Severity J/K/L (immediate jeopardy)
9,862 citations where CMS found an immediate threat to resident life or safety — the highest severity band.
4.57
Harm-rate citations/facility — Illinois (highest)
Illinois leads all states: 3,042 Severity G+ citations across 666 facilities cited — the highest harm rate in the dataset.
14.7×
Disparity between highest and lowest harm-rate states
Illinois (4.57 G+ per facility) vs New Hampshire (0.31) — the widest state-level enforcement gap across any CMS Care Compare dataset published to date.

What this report is, and is not

This report aggregates the CMS Care Compare NH Health Deficiencies dataset (snapshot fetched 2026-05-08, CMS source modified 2026-04-17) at the national and state levels. It reports CMS-published deficiency citations — the official enforcement record that results from annual and complaint-driven CMS surveys.

It does not:

  • Rate any facility on its own. CMS conducts the surveys; Fonteum reports the citation record.
  • Recommend or warn against any specific facility.
  • Surface facility-level citations on any directory page. This snapshot is research-only.
  • Mix CMS enforcement data with consumer reviews.

"Harm rate" as used in this report means Severity G+ citations per facility cited in a given state. It is not a composite score and does not adjust for facility count, bed size, or resident acuity. It is a normalized frequency measure of CMS-documented actual-harm citations.

Source: CMS Care Compare NH Health Deficiencies · CMS source modified 2026-04-17 · Snapshot fetched 2026-05-08. CMS citations are published by CMS; Fonteum reports them, it does not independently inspect or rate any facility.

Severity breakdown

The CMS deficiency severity scale runs from A (isolated, no harm) to L (widespread immediate jeopardy). Fonteum groups these into four bands:

Severity band CMS codes Citations % of total
No harm A, B, C 9,756 2.3%
Minimal harm D, E, F 385,017 92.1%
Actual harm G, H, I 23,368 5.59%
Immediate jeopardy J, K, L 9,862 2.36%

The bulk of citations (92.1%) fall in the minimal-harm band (D–F). Severity D alone accounts for 261,886 citations (62.6%) — the single largest category. Severity G (actual harm, not widespread) accounts for 13,021 citations; Severity J (immediate jeopardy, isolated) accounts for 6,894.

Source: CMS Care Compare NH Health Deficiencies · CMS source modified 2026-04-17 · Snapshot fetched 2026-05-08. CMS citations are published by CMS; Fonteum reports them, it does not independently inspect or rate any facility.

Top F-tags cited

F-tags are the CMS regulatory citation codes used in health deficiency surveys. The three most-cited F-tags in this dataset:

  1. F0880 — Infection Prevention & Control: 23,555 citations (5.63% of total). Covers hand hygiene, PPE use, and infection surveillance protocols — elevated post-pandemic.
  2. F0689 — Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision: 21,352 citations (5.11%). Covers fall prevention and environment-of-care hazard mitigation.
  3. F0812 — Food and Nutrition Services: 19,927 citations (4.77%). Covers food storage, preparation safety, and temperature compliance.

Together these three F-tags represent 15.3% of all 418,148 citations. The high volume of F0880 reflects the sustained CMS enforcement focus on infection control since 2020.

Source: CMS Care Compare NH Health Deficiencies · CMS source modified 2026-04-17 · Snapshot fetched 2026-05-08. CMS citations are published by CMS; Fonteum reports them, it does not independently inspect or rate any facility.

State harm rates (G+ citations per facility)

Top 5 states by harm rate (G+ citations per facility cited):

State Harm rate Facilities cited
Illinois 4.57 666
Utah 3.19 97
Rhode Island 3.16 73
Washington DC 2.94 17
Vermont 2.65 34

Bottom 5 states by harm rate:

State Harm rate Facilities cited
Nevada 0.49 66
Arkansas 0.51 220
Puerto Rico 0.56 9
Arizona 0.59 140
New Hampshire 0.31 74

The 14.7× gap between Illinois (4.57) and New Hampshire (0.31) is the widest state-level enforcement disparity across any CMS Care Compare dataset published by Fonteum to date. Illinois's high harm rate reflects both enforcement intensity and a large, heavily-regulated urban long-term-care market.

Interpretation caution: Harm rate reflects citations per facility cited — not outcomes per resident or per bed. States with fewer but larger facilities, or with more aggressive survey regimes, may show higher rates independent of underlying care quality. This metric is a measure of CMS survey findings, not a direct measure of care quality.

Source: CMS Care Compare NH Health Deficiencies · CMS source modified 2026-04-17 · Snapshot fetched 2026-05-08. CMS citations are published by CMS; Fonteum reports them, it does not independently inspect or rate any facility.

Limitations

  • Snapshot date. CMS source modified 2026-04-17; fetched 2026-05-08. CMS publishes quarterly updates; values shift with each release.
  • Harm rate is not risk-adjusted. G+ citations per facility cited does not adjust for bed size, resident acuity, payer mix, or survey frequency. High harm rates may reflect aggressive survey enforcement as much as care quality differences.
  • F-tag top-3 is not exhaustive. 418,148 citations span hundreds of distinct F-tags. Only the three most-cited are detailed here.
  • No facility-level data. State aggregates are research-only. No facility-level citations attach to provider profiles.
  • Immediate jeopardy subset overlap. Severity J/K/L (immediate jeopardy) is a subset of Severity G+ for counting purposes. The 2.36% immediate-jeopardy share is already included in the 5.59% G+ share.
  • CMS methodology is canonical. Citation severity classifications reflect CMS survey findings. Fonteum does not re-adjudicate severity levels. Any replication must reference CMS's published surveyor guidance.
  • No quality claim. State harm rates are descriptive statistics from CMS enforcement data. They are not endorsements, recommendations, or guarantees about any state's nursing homes, and Fonteum does not rate, inspect, verify, endorse, or guarantee any facility.

Source: CMS Care Compare NH Health Deficiencies · CMS source modified 2026-04-17 · Snapshot fetched 2026-05-08. CMS citations are published by CMS; Fonteum reports them, it does not independently inspect or rate any facility.

Methodology

  1. CMS Care Compare NH Health Deficiencies snapshot fetched 2026-05-08 (CMS source modified 2026-04-17). Stored at public/research/data/cms-nh-deficiencies-2026-05-08.json.
  2. Severity groupings follow the CMS A–L scale: no harm (A–C), minimal harm (D–F), actual harm (G–I), immediate jeopardy (J–L).
  3. Harm rate = Severity G+ citations ÷ facilities cited, computed per state.
  4. Top F-tags ranked by raw citation count across all severity levels.
  5. National pct_g_plus = G+ citations ÷ total citations (all severity levels with known code).
  6. Snapshot summary stored in _summary block of the JSON artifact; national figures read directly from _summary.total_citations, _summary.pct_g_plus, _summary.pct_immediate_jeopardy.

Source: CMS Care Compare NH Health Deficiencies · CMS source modified 2026-04-17 · Snapshot fetched 2026-05-08. CMS citations are published by CMS; Fonteum reports them, it does not independently inspect or rate any facility.

Citation and reuse

Permitted with attribution to Fonteum Research and a link back to this page. Suggested citation:

Fonteum Research. Nursing Home Health Deficiencies & Harm Rate by State (2026). Published 2026-05-25. https://fonteum.com/research/nursing-home-deficiency-harm-rate-2026

The underlying CMS data is a U.S. Government Work in the public domain (https://www.usa.gov/government-works). Direct citations to CMS should reference https://data.cms.gov/provider-data/topics/nursing-homes.

Limitations

  • This study's findings are scoped to the dataset and time window described in the methodology. They do not constitute medical, legal, or financial advice.
  • Fonteum does not independently rate, inspect, verify, endorse, or guarantee any provider referenced in this study.

Methodology

Read the full methodology↓

CMS Care Compare NH Health Deficiencies snapshot (source modified 2026-04-17, fetched 2026-05-08). 418,148 citations across 14,635 facilities. Severity groupings: no harm A–C; minimal harm D–F; actual harm G–I; immediate jeopardy J–L. Harm rate = Severity G+ citations ÷ facilities cited per state. National pct_g_plus = 5.59%; pct_immediate_jeopardy = 2.36%. Top F-tags by raw citation count. No risk adjustment for bed size, acuity, or survey frequency. CMS citations are published enforcement records; Fonteum does not independently inspect or rate any facility.

CMS Care Compare NH Health Deficiencies snapshot (source modified 2026-04-17, fetched 2026-05-08). 418,148 citations across 14,635 facilities. Severity groupings: no harm A–C; minimal harm D–F; actual harm G–I; immediate jeopardy J–L. Harm rate = Severity G+ citations ÷ facilities cited per state. National pct_g_plus = 5.59%; pct_immediate_jeopardy = 2.36%. Top F-tags by raw citation count. No risk adjustment for bed size, acuity, or survey frequency. CMS citations are published enforcement records; Fonteum does not independently inspect or rate any facility.

Cite this study

Fonteum. (2026). Nursing Home Health Deficiencies & Harm Rate by State (2026). Fonteum (methodology v2026.05.0). https://fonteum.com/research/nursing-home-deficiency-harm-rate-2026
https://fonteum.com/research/nursing-home-deficiency-harm-rate-2026
@misc{fonteum2026nursinghomedeficiencyharmrate2026, author = {Fonteum}, title = {Nursing Home Health Deficiencies & Harm Rate by State (2026)}, year = {2026}, url = {https://fonteum.com/research/nursing-home-deficiency-harm-rate-2026}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-25} }

Attribution: Fonteum analysis · methodology v2026.05.0

Snapshot date: 2026

Press / data requests: press@fonteum.com

fonteum

Healthcare provider data, traced to source.


RESEARCH

  • Research hub
  • Data platform
  • For health-tech
  • Pricing
  • Press kit

NETWORK

  • Coverage
  • Healthcare graph

ABOUT

  • Mission
  • Methodology
  • Editorial policy
  • Corrections log
  • Security
  • SLA
  • Support
  • Refresh cadence
  • Terms
  • Contact

SUBSCRIBE

The monthly research digest. One email, first of each month. Unsubscribe anytime.


© 2026 FONTEUM RESEARCH · DATA SNAPSHOT MAY 8, 2026 · BUILT WITH CARE

  • X
  • LINKEDIN
  • PRESS