Skip to content
fonteum
ResearchToolsFonteumPricingCoverageMethodologyTrustAbout
DATA · MAY 8, 2026
Fonteum/Research/Provider Directory Accuracy Index — Q2 2026

Contents

  1. Overview
  2. Methodology summary
  3. Limitations
  4. Limitations
  5. Methodology
  6. Technical appendix
  7. Cite this study
Download dataset (CSV)

0 records

Care quality desk

Provider Directory Accuracy Index — Q2 2026

Cross-source field-level agreement between CMS NPPES, CMS Care Compare, and PECOS for every NPI present in ≥2 sources — aggregated to national, state, and specialty scope. Quarterly index; Q2 2026 issuance.

By Fonteum Research·Published June 15, 2026·0 records·1 charts·Cite this study →
Contents · 7 sections↓
  1. Overview
  2. Methodology summary
  3. Limitations
  4. Limitations
  5. Methodology
  6. Technical appendix
  7. Cite this study

Executive Summary

  • The Provider Directory Accuracy Index measures cross-source agreement between three federal databases for every NPI present in at least two sources. A high score indicates consistent information across databases; a low score flags potential ghost-network or stale-data risk.
  • Scored fields: practice address (city + state), primary specialty taxonomy, organizational affiliation (CCN), and phone number. Each field is scored independently; the composite is the average of fields with ≥50% NPI coverage.
  • National score, state leaderboard, and specialty breakdown are published at /research/provider-directory-accuracy and downloadable as CSV.
  • This index publishes quarterly — Q1 in March, Q2 in June, Q3 in September, Q4 in December — generating four earned-media news hooks per year.
  • All data sourced from federal public records. Fonteum does not independently inspect, assess, or rate any provider.
Download the full dataset (CSV, 0 records)

At a glance — for journalists, researchers, and AI agents

What this dataset covers

  • ✓Cross-source field-level agreement between NPPES, Care Compare, and PECOS
  • ✓National accuracy score
  • ✓Per-state accuracy scores and leaderboard
  • ✓Per-specialty accuracy scores
  • ✓Quarterly trend (when multiple periods available)

What this dataset does NOT cover

  • ✕Ground-truth provider accuracy (only cross-source agreement)
  • ✕Individual provider-level scores (aggregate only)
  • ✕Payer-specific directory accuracy
  • ✕Historical accuracy before 2026-Q2
  • ✕International providers

Sources

  • CMS NPPES
  • CMS Care Compare
  • CMS PECOS

Snapshot date: Q2 2026

Dataset scope · Snapshot June 15, 2026

Includes: the healthcare-provider records this study covers, each tracing to a dated public-record source named in the citation footer. Does not include: providers outside the source named for this study, or records not present in that source at the snapshot date. Counts describe this Fonteum healthcare-provider dataset — not a representative census of the U.S. healthcare workforce.

Key findings

3
Federal sources cross-referenced
NPPES (self-reported), CMS Care Compare (CMS-curated), and PECOS (Medicare enrollment) — all Tier-2 federal public records.
4
Fields scored per NPI
Practice address, primary specialty taxonomy, organizational affiliation (CCN), and phone number.
Quarterly
Publication cadence
Q1 (March 15), Q2 (June 15), Q3 (September 15), Q4 (December 15). Four earned-media cycles per year.

Overview

The Provider Directory Accuracy Index (PDAI) answers a simple question: how consistently do three federal provider databases describe the same providers?

Why it matters: CMS fines health plans for inaccurate provider directories under the No Surprises Act. State AGs pursue insurers over "ghost networks" — listed providers who no longer accept the plan. Journalists report on the problem every quarter. This index quantifies it.

What it is not: A ground-truth accuracy measurement. If a provider's address is wrong in the same way across all three federal sources, the PDAI scores it as "accurate." Cross-source agreement is a necessary, not sufficient, condition for directory accuracy.

Methodology summary

All computation is performed by Methodology · pdai/v1.

Step 1 — NPI intersection: Include only NPIs present in ≥2 of the three sources. NPIs in only one source have no comparison partner.

Step 2 — Pairwise comparison: For each NPI, compare all source pairs (NPPES × Care Compare, NPPES × PECOS, Care Compare × PECOS when applicable).

Step 3 — Field agreement rate: Count exact-value matches / total comparisons per field.

Step 4 — Coverage filter: Fields where <50% of NPIs have a non-null value in ≥2 sources are excluded from the composite.

Step 5 — Composite score: Simple average of coverage-passing fields.

Limitations

See the Limitations section below. Most important: agreement ≠ ground truth.

Limitations

  • Cross-source agreement is a proxy for accuracy — fields that are wrong the same way across all sources score as accurate.
  • Address granularity is city + state only in pdai/v1; ZIP-level and street-level matching is deferred.
  • Specialty codes are matched exactly; taxonomy synonym expansion not performed in v1.
  • Snapshot timing differs across sources — NPPES, Care Compare, and PECOS have different update cadences.
  • Type-2 (organizational) NPIs excluded from pdai/v1; scored separately in a future version.

Methodology

Read the full methodology↓

Sources: CMS NPPES (bulk download, Tier-2), CMS Care Compare (bulk download, Tier-2), CMS PECOS PPEF (bulk download, Tier-2).

Unit of analysis: Individual NPI (Type-1 providers only in pdai/v1).

Fields scored: practice_address (city + state normalized lowercase), primary_specialty (NUCC 10-digit taxonomy code exact match), org_affiliation (6-char CCN or organizational NPI), telecom (10-digit phone digits only).

Minimum sample: 100 matched NPIs per scope. Scopes below threshold return no score.

Composite: Simple average of coverage-passing field rates (≥50% NPI coverage required per field).

Cadence: Quarterly cron, 09:00 UTC on the 15th of March, June, September, and December.

Methodology version: pdai/v1. Pinned constant in src/lib/research/accuracy-index/scoring.ts.

Sources: CMS NPPES (bulk download, Tier-2), CMS Care Compare (bulk download, Tier-2), CMS PECOS PPEF (bulk download, Tier-2).

Unit of analysis: Individual NPI (Type-1 providers only in pdai/v1).

Fields scored: practice_address (city + state normalized lowercase), primary_specialty (NUCC 10-digit taxonomy code exact match), org_affiliation (6-char CCN or organizational NPI), telecom (10-digit phone digits only).

Minimum sample: 100 matched NPIs per scope. Scopes below threshold return no score.

Composite: Simple average of coverage-passing field rates (≥50% NPI coverage required per field).

Cadence: Quarterly cron, 09:00 UTC on the 15th of March, June, September, and December.

Methodology version: pdai/v1. Pinned constant in src/lib/research/accuracy-index/scoring.ts.

Technical appendix

Show technical details · script paths · field names↓

Scoring module: src/lib/research/accuracy-index/scoring.ts Compute orchestrator: src/lib/research/accuracy-index/compute.ts Inngest cron: src/inngest/functions/provider-directory-accuracy-quarterly.ts Migration: migrations/2026_05_11_provider_directory_accuracy.sql Methodology version constant: PDAI_VERSION = 'pdai/v1'

Open for the script paths, raw dataset filenames, and per-field aggregation rules behind this snapshot. Reader-facing methodology above already covers source, date, and limitations.

Cite this study

Fonteum. (2026). Provider Directory Accuracy Index — Q2 2026. Fonteum (methodology v2026.05.0). https://fonteum.com/research/provider-directory-accuracy-2026-q2
https://fonteum.com/research/provider-directory-accuracy-2026-q2
@misc{fonteum2026providerdirectoryaccuracy2026q2, author = {Fonteum}, title = {Provider Directory Accuracy Index — Q2 2026}, year = {2026}, url = {https://fonteum.com/research/provider-directory-accuracy-2026-q2}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-25} }

Attribution: Fonteum analysis · methodology v2026.05.0

Snapshot date: Q2 2026

Dataset: Download CSV (0 records)

Press / data requests: press@fonteum.com

Related research

Research

Nursing Home Quality by State 2026 — CMS Care Compare State-Level Snapshot

May 2026

Dermatologists

National Dermatology Supply by State — NPPES 2026 Snapshot

May 2026

Research

Federal Data Gap on Nursing Home Ownership Won't Close — and Fonteum Maps What CMS Doesn't

May 2026

fonteum

Healthcare provider data, traced to source.


RESEARCH

  • Research hub
  • Data platform
  • For health-tech
  • Pricing
  • Press kit

NETWORK

  • Coverage
  • Healthcare graph

ABOUT

  • Mission
  • Methodology
  • Editorial policy
  • Corrections log
  • Security
  • SLA
  • Support
  • Refresh cadence
  • Terms
  • Contact

SUBSCRIBE

The monthly research digest. One email, first of each month. Unsubscribe anytime.


© 2026 FONTEUM RESEARCH · DATA SNAPSHOT MAY 8, 2026 · BUILT WITH CARE

  • X
  • LINKEDIN
  • PRESS